home | documents | sample protest letters | discussion (blog) | contact

BROE

AUGUSTIN

WHY ACT?
WHAT'S AT RISK?
WHY YOU ?
ABOUT THE APPLICANT
WHAT THEY WANT
HOW MUCH WATER?
WHAT YOU CAN DO
HOW TO PROTEST
SAMPLE LETTERS
DEADLINES & DETAILS
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

ABOUT US

BLOG

DOCUMENTS

SUPPORT THIS SITE

 

SAVE
YOUR
WATER RIGHTS


San Augustin Plains

Annual SAWC meeting May 22, 2010

The annual meeting of the San Augustin Water Coalition was held May 22. Board elections were held and the OSE Docketing Letter was discussed.  Thee was a brief business meeting followed by a candidates forum.  More...

 

San Augustin Water Grab Update (09/29/09)
by Carol Pittman

We are at present in limbo where the Augustin Plains Ranch attempted water grab is concerned. The Office of the State Engineer must set a hearing date and inform all 1000 protestants of that date.  The OSE seems to be reluctant to set a date for whatever reason, and we don't know what that reason is except that it is such a big job to inform everyone.  The only activity lately has been the drilling of a second test well.  The first well was drilled a year or so ago on the south side of Hwy 60; this second well is on the north side of Hwy 60.  (APR has permission to drill three test wells.)  We have no information about these wells.  Drill logs from the first well have not been made available to us and we expect that we will not get drill logs from this second well.  Our attorney has told us that the applicant (Augustin Plains Ranch) will have to make them available when there is a hearing.


The San Augustin Water Coalition remains active, the Board meeting every other month to monitor the situation.  The residents most affected are in northern Catron County, particularly around Datil.  There is a group in Pie Town that is affiliated with SAWC, and another group forming in Magdalena, also affiliated with SAWC, that are offering support to the protest.  The problem we have with this process taking so long is that people think that the problem has gone away.  It has not and we will continue to keep people informed to the best of our ability so that we don't get caught by surprise when something happens.


If you'd like to be added to our email list for updates CLICK HERE.  All addresses are kept private.

John Larson Mountain Mail Article (note next to last pararagraph, quote from Gov. Richardson)

San Augustin Water Coalition (SAWC) board meeting August 11, Datil Fire Dept. [Agenda]

Legal Process

10/28/08 - Carol Pittman supplied the following info:

"If I plan to speak at the hearing when it is scheduled by the Office of the State Engineer, do I have to notify all the other protestants of my intention to present my protest?"

I can't fully answer this question yet because no scheduling order has been issued. All protesters should receive a notice within a few months informing them of the date and time of a "prehearing conference" and asking them to pay $25.00 each (one-time payment) to pay for the hearing. At or soon after this prehearing conference, the hearing examiner should issue a scheduling order that will establish various deadlines, such as discovery and motions deadlines, and a hearing date (or dates).

At the hearing, APR will bear the burden of proving its case, which is 1) there is unappropriated water, 2) their new appropriation will not impair existing water rights and is 3) consistent with public welfare and (4) not contrary to conservation of water.

After APR puts on their case, all the protesters will have the right to put on their case, which could require a long time given the number of protesters.

The OSE will also provide testimony (either for APR's application, against it, or for it with conditions), which may come before or after APR.

I would imagine every protester who desires to put on a case will have to provide notice of their intent at some point, and then the hearing examiner would have to schedule the order in which each protester present their cases. I don't know at this time whether you'll have to provide notice to everyone. Although special rules might be adopted in this case, you usually have to mail a copy of any paper, e.g., motions, you file with the hearing examiner to all other parties in the case.

09/18/09 Win in Broe water grab fight - implications for Augustin

09/15/08 Comment from Attorney Bruce Frederick:

The first hearing for the Augustin Plains Ranch LLC application at the NM Office of State Engineer will not occur for a long while--months. This first hearing will only be in front of a hearing examiner and only deal with procedural issues. It will not address the protests themselves.

09/15/08 Comment from Attorney Bruce Frederick re fees:

The $25 is OSE's fee for participation in the whole "hearing process," which will likely consists of a number of hearings over the years. The types of hearings will likely include the following:

1. Scheduling hearings, where the hearing examiner (with input from the parties) decides such things as when experts are identified and their reports due, what fact witnesses will be called, when "dispositive motions" must be filed, when "discovery" ends, etc.

2. Hearing on motions.

3. Hearing on the evidence, which will look a lot like a trial. This is the real deal where the witnesses are called and testify. There may be a separate hearing where the parties submit their closing arguments.

$25 buys your right to participate in the whole process. OSE should not ask anyone for any more money. The Office of the State Engineer will notify you individually of the hearing. You will then send to the OSE at whatever address they tell you the $25 fee to fully participate in the protest process.

contact: water@catroncounty.net  (575) 773-4835