|
Annual SAWC meeting May 22, 2010
The
annual meeting of the San Augustin
Water Coalition was held May 22. Board elections were held and the
OSE Docketing Letter was discussed. Thee was a brief business
meeting followed by a candidates forum. More...
San Augustin Water Grab Update (09/29/09)
by Carol Pittman
We are at present in limbo where
the Augustin Plains Ranch attempted
water grab is concerned. The
Office of the State Engineer must
set a hearing date and inform all
1000 protestants of that date. The
OSE seems to be reluctant to set
a date for whatever reason, and we
don't know what that reason is except
that it is such a big job to inform
everyone. The only activity
lately has been the drilling of a
second test well. The first
well was drilled a year or so ago
on the south side of Hwy 60; this
second well is on the north side
of Hwy 60. (APR has permission
to drill three test wells.) We
have no information about these wells. Drill
logs from the first well have not
been made available to us and we
expect that we will not get drill
logs from this second well. Our
attorney has told us that the
applicant (Augustin Plains Ranch)
will have to make them available
when there is a hearing.
The San Augustin Water Coalition
remains active, the Board meeting
every other month to monitor the
situation. The residents most
affected are in northern Catron County,
particularly around Datil. There
is a group in Pie Town that is affiliated
with SAWC, and another group forming
in Magdalena, also affiliated with
SAWC, that are offering support to
the protest. The problem we
have with this process taking so
long is that people think that the
problem has gone away. It has
not and we will continue to keep
people informed to the best of our
ability so that we don't get caught
by surprise when something happens.
If you'd like to be added to our
email list for updates CLICK
HERE. All
addresses are kept private.
John
Larson Mountain Mail Article (note next to last pararagraph, quote from Gov. Richardson)
San
Augustin Water Coalition (SAWC) board
meeting August 11, Datil Fire
Dept. [Agenda]
Legal Process
10/28/08 - Carol Pittman supplied
the following info:
"If I plan to speak at the
hearing when it is scheduled by the Office
of the State Engineer, do I have to notify all
the other protestants of my intention to present
my protest?"
I can't fully answer this question yet because
no scheduling order has been issued. All
protesters should receive a notice within
a few months informing them of the date and
time of a "prehearing
conference" and asking them to pay $25.00
each (one-time payment) to pay for the hearing.
At or soon after this prehearing conference,
the hearing examiner should issue a scheduling
order that will establish various deadlines,
such as discovery and motions deadlines,
and a hearing date (or dates).
At the hearing, APR will bear the burden of proving
its case, which is 1) there is unappropriated
water, 2) their new appropriation will not impair
existing water rights and is 3) consistent with
public welfare and (4) not contrary to conservation
of water.
After APR puts on their case, all the protesters
will have the right to put on their case, which
could require a long time given the number of
protesters.
The OSE will also provide testimony (either for
APR's application, against it, or for it with
conditions), which may come before or after APR.
I would imagine every protester who desires to
put on a case will have to provide notice of
their intent at some point, and then the hearing
examiner would have to schedule the order in
which each protester present their cases. I don't
know at this time whether you'll have to provide
notice to everyone. Although special rules might
be adopted in this case, you usually have to
mail a copy of any paper, e.g., motions, you
file with the hearing examiner to all other parties
in the case.
09/18/09 Win in Broe water grab fight - implications
for Augustin
09/15/08 Comment from Attorney Bruce Frederick:
The first hearing for the Augustin Plains Ranch
LLC application at the NM Office of State Engineer
will not occur for a long while--months. This
first hearing will only be in front of a hearing
examiner and only deal with procedural issues.
It will not address the protests themselves.
09/15/08 Comment from Attorney Bruce Frederick
re fees:
The $25 is OSE's fee for participation
in the whole "hearing process," which
will likely consists of a number of hearings
over the years. The types of hearings will
likely include the following:
1. Scheduling hearings, where the hearing
examiner (with input from the parties)
decides such things as when experts are
identified and their reports due, what
fact witnesses will be called, when "dispositive
motions" must be filed, when "discovery" ends,
etc.
2. Hearing on motions.
3. Hearing on the evidence, which will
look a lot like a trial. This is the real
deal where the witnesses are called and
testify. There may be a separate hearing
where the parties submit their closing
arguments.
$25 buys your right
to participate in the whole process. OSE
should not ask anyone for any more money. The
Office of the State Engineer will notify
you individually of the hearing. You will
then send to the OSE at whatever address
they tell you the $25 fee to fully participate
in the protest process.
|