Broe Land & Acquisitions
Inc. Application
Great Western Land and Cattle Company, a division of The Broe Group, applied for 13 drilling permits totaling 7,768 acre-feet of water per year in northwestern Catron County northwest of Quemado. Great Western is a land development company based in Denver, CO.
Monday,
June 9, 2008 Broe Land & Acquisitions
III second conference
Monday,
September 29, 2008 Broe
first hearing on second application
UPDATE 09/18/09
Bruce Frederick, Staff Attorney with New Mexico
Environmental Law Center represents a number
of protesters opposed to the Broe Land and
Acquisitions III, LLC applications. Broe filed
multiple applications to appropriate 1000s
of acre-feet of water, which are being considered
by the State Engineer in two separate cases.
In the first case, Broe is seeking to appropriate
about 2500 acre-feet per year, mostly to allegedly
irrigate State Trust Lands that it has under
lease with State Land Commissioner Lyons.
Frederick filed a motion
for summary judgment based on a statute in
the 1907 Water Code that requires irrigation
water rights to be owned by the same person
who owns the irrigated land, i.e., the title
to the land and the irrigation water right
cannot be split, subject to a narrow exception
that does not apply to Broe. Broe’s
applications violate this law because Broe
would end up owning an irrigation water right
that was appurtenant to State Trust Land—land
that Broe does not own. The Land Office also
has policies and laws that require irrigation
water rights to be in the Commissioner’s
name. OSE weakly opposed the motion, although
it did not dispute the basic contention of
law.
Frederick also sent a long list of Interrogatories
and Requests for Production to Broe requesting
that it fully document and justify the amounts
of water they were attempting to appropriate,
among other things, and to prove that they
would be able to put the water to beneficial
use within a reasonably period of time (which
is a requirement under our law).
Broe’s attorney
requested a week extension to respond to the
motion and then still did not file the response.
After a couple days of not responding to phone
calls, Broe’s
attorney sent Frederick an email stating that
Broe has determined that it no longer wishes
to pursue the applications, and that Broe’s
attorney would be submitting a withdrawal to
the OSE Hearings Unit today.
While it is still not
known whether Broe’s
withdrawal of applications will apply to both
cases, it is nevertheless a victory in either
case.
The first scheduling
conference for the second case will be on
9/29. Mr. Frederick should know the scope
of Broe’s withdrawal by
then.
Broe is a major international corporation,
like those backing Augustin Plains Ranch, LLC,
so please spread the news about this victory.
Bruce Frederick, Staff Attorney
New Mexico Environmental Law Center
1405 Luisa Street, Suite 5
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505
505-989-9022, ext. 26
|